"Can you also…" · just landed

What did we
actually agree to?

ScopeLinq turns the kickoff recap or email thread you already have into a record your client confirms — then answers every "can you also…" from that record, not from you.

Monthly packages or fixed-fee projects. No new project-management system. Not a contract — the record that sits beside it.

Try it on a sample → Start free
Scroll
Try it yourself

A request arrives.
The record answers.

Tap a client message. Every answer cites the line you both confirmed — or says the record doesn't cover it.

SL-2041CONFIRMED BY BOTH PARTIES
Confirmed · Sep 4
12 long-form and 4 short-form videos each month — that is the monthly count
22 revision rounds per asset; a round is one consolidated set of notes
3Edits back within 48 hours of receiving the consolidated notes
4Anything past the monthly count is quoted before work starts — $450 short-form, $1,400 long-form
5$6,500 a month, invoiced on the 1st, net 15
6Month to month; either side may end on 30 days' written notice
7Halden provides raw footage and brand assets by the 5th; Ren is the single feedback contact
SENT VIEWED CONFIRMED
Ready-to-send reply · yours to edit
TWO EQUAL PATHS, EVERY REQUEST · BACKLOG ITEMS PROMOTE ANYTIME
Try it on a sample → Walk the full loop with your own second inbox

Want a walkthrough with your own thread?

Book a quick call
Every engagement follows the same pattern
01 / 04
Conversation Record "Can you also…" Decision

It starts in a thread — an email, a call recap, a Slack message. Any capture tool, any language.

Confirmed line by line, by both sides. Timestamped, on the record.

"Can you also…" arrives mid-month — checked against the record the moment it lands.

The record answers. You decide: quote it now, or save it for next month.

Client"yes to the monthly plan we walked through 👍"
"$6,500 on the 1st works — footage to you by the 5th"
You"perfect. 2 long-form + 4 shorts a month, 2 rounds each, edits back in 48h?"
"confirmed. oh — any chance we can squeeze in a third reel before Friday? should be quick"
SL-2041MONTHLY VIDEO RETAINER · RECORD
Confirmed · Sep 4
12 long-form and 4 short-form videos a month
22 revision rounds per asset, 48-hour turnaround
3Anything past the monthly count is quoted before work starts
4Month to month, 30 days' notice
SENT VIEWED CONFIRMED
Any chance we can squeeze in a third reel before Friday?
● Additional work Outside SL-2041, line 3: "anything past the monthly count is quoted before work starts."
Keep scrolling

It arrives mid-project. It sounds small. And you say yes — not because it's free, but because you don't want to lose them. Nobody can point to what was actually agreed, so the conversation never happens.

$450
The extra reel in the sample, at the rate the client already agreed to — quoted instead of done as a favor.
Pro is $29 a month. One quoted extra covers fifteen of them. ScopeLinq doesn't make the client say yes — it makes the ask arrive as a quote.

Your notetaker remembers what was said — it can't confirm anything.

Your PM tool tracks the work on your side — a task board isn't something your client agreed to.

Your contract has the rule. It doesn't have the moment.

Nothing holds a record you both confirmed when the work changes. That's the gap.

Your contract handles the beginning. ScopeLinq handles what changes afterward.

For agencies and studios that sell defined deliverables — monthly packages or fixed-fee projects.
Why you can believe it
It cites the line you both confirmed — or says the record doesn't cover it.
T–01

Every answer points to a confirmed line

If the record doesn't cover it, ScopeLinq says "needs clarification." And when it reads your thread, it leaves out any line it can't trace to your words — it doesn't invent terms.

T–02

We stay out of your money

No payments, no invoicing. You copy the SL reference into the tools you already use — or export the record as JSON.

T–03

Confirmed, timestamped, yours

Both parties on every record, every step timestamped. Your threads are never used to train AI.

What the record shows

Even silence becomes
part of the record.

Sent

The agreement leaves your hands, on the record.

MAR 1 · 9:14 AM
Viewed

Your client opened it. Timestamped automatically.

MAR 1 · 4:52 PM
Confirmed

Both parties on the record. Every rung has value; reminders capped at two.

MAR 3 · 11:06 AM
"
We're proceeding based on the agreement sent March 1. Reply if anything needs to change.
The Proceeding Notice — silence, documented
Downstream of any capture tool · Upstream of any invoice

Start free. Go Pro when every request
deserves an answer.

Free
$0
Every agreement, on the record.
  • Unlimited records — paste a thread, send it, get it confirmed
  • 5 request checks to see the verdict on real "can you also…" messages
  • 3 change orders per record
  • The reply, yours to edit
Start free
Pro
$29 /month
For agencies that answer every "what did we agree to?" from the record.
Founding rate
First 50 paying agencies keep $29/month.

The rate is yours for as long as you stay subscribed. 2 of 50 taken.

  • Unlimited request checks
  • Unlimited change orders on every record
  • Upload a document instead of pasting
First 50 paying accounts. Held while your subscription stays continuous; one account, non-transferable. Cancel any time.
Start at $29/month →
Agency
Custom
For studios running several client engagements at once.
  • Everything in Pro
  • Team seats
  • Onboarding with your own threads
  • Priority support
  • Invoice billing
Talk to us →
Fair questions

What skeptics ask first.

Does it work for retainers and for fixed-fee projects?
Both. The record holds the deliverable count, the revision rounds, the turnaround, the extras rate, the fee and the term — whether that repeats monthly or ends at delivery.
"It's easy with AI now — can you just add it?"
The record still holds the count. The reply cites it, names the extras rate you already agreed, and asks for the go-ahead. How the work gets done doesn't change what was agreed.
Is this the answer to scope creep?
It's the answer to the moment scope creep happens: the message lands, the record answers, the reply goes out as a quote or a yes. Your contract has the rule; this is the moment.
I already have contracts.
Good — keep them. ScopeLinq isn’t your contract; it’s everything that changes after the contract is signed. Your contract set the project; the record tracks the "one more things" your contract never anticipated.
Is this just AI summarizing my notes?
The AI drafts; you edit; your client confirms. From then on, every answer is Included, Additional work, or Needs clarification — always citing the line you both confirmed, or saying the record doesn't cover it. An AI opinion is never sent to your client.
Will clients actually confirm?
Confirming is one click on a clean, plain-English list — and it protects them as much as you. Even when they don’t, a Sent-and-Viewed record already beats a text thread, reminders are capped at two, and the Proceeding Notice turns silence into documented context.
Do I have to record my calls?
No. ScopeLinq records nothing. Paste whatever you already have — an email, a text thread, meeting notes, or the export from any notetaker you use. Any language in, a clean English scope out.
What happens to my data?
Your notes and agreements are never used to train AI. Records are two-party confirmed, signed, and timestamped — and they’re yours.
Be among the first 50 on the record

The next "can you also…"
already has an answer.

Paste one thread. See the record. Send it to a client this week.

Try it on a sample → Start free
SL-0001·YOUR NEXT ENGAGEMENT·UNWRITTEN — UNTIL YOU START